Need Base and Pre-Approval — The RIR Veto over IPv4 Transfers
Should an operator need its recordkeeper’s permission to invest?
The Notes of Lu Heng
Who gave the Internet’s recordkeepers the power to govern it? These Notes follow that question from everyday analogies to a different design for the network.
All Notes
Follow a question, find a particular Note, or read how the argument develops.
IP addresses, markets and the difference between owning and asking permission.
15 Notes found · Page 1 / 2
Should an operator need its recordkeeper’s permission to invest?
Was the registry system ever built to equalise scarcity between rich and poor?
Does a need-based system protect poorer countries, or formalise their disadvantage?
What does uniqueness actually require, and what has been built on top of it?
Can a clerical liability shell govern an asset class worth trillions?
What is an IP address, and why does the ledger’s keeper matter less than the ledger?
Is IPv4 scarce if its price barely registers in the cost of running a server?
Does treating IPv4 as an asset raise the price of connectivity?
How do auditing and pre-approval turn a market into a ration queue?
Why did twenty years of IPv6 promotion not replace IPv4 in the real economy?
Why does the author call himself a capitalist, and what did denied scarcity cost the industry?
What happens to IPv4’s value once it is priced like other assets that unlock revenue?
The claim that IPv4 could reach a total value of $60 trillion is not rhetorical. It follows from basic asset economics once IPv4 is treated for what it actually is: a scarce, irreplaceable service-enabling asset.